Deployed is not a financial term. It shows up in decks because it sounds like revenue without having to behave like revenue, and nobody makes a private company prove the difference. Agility Robotics won't be private much longer. Its Digit humanoids have logged more than 65,000 operating hours across nine customer sites. Net sales last year were $1.8 million.
Hours are engineering. Dollars are commerce.
Both numbers come out of Agility's S-4. The company is merging with Churchill Capital Corp. XI at a $2.5 billion valuation, a deal expected to raise more than $620 million in gross proceeds. The Robot Report went through the filing on September 7. It also shows a $140 million operating loss and $111 million of operating spend, up from $71 million the year before.
Divide the sales by the hours and you get under thirty dollars an hour, and that flatters it, because the hours are cumulative and the revenue covers one year. Most of those hours were never sold. They were spent proving a bipedal robot can survive a working warehouse, which is a real thing to prove and a different thing from a customer.
Track the two separately and never let one stand in for the other. An hour of runtime tells you the engineering holds. A dollar tells you somebody watched what the hour produced and decided it beat the alternative on cost, or on injury rate, or on the third shift they can't staff. A company that lets runtime speak for demand will size its fleet to a market nobody has tested.
One order carries the whole case
The filing names more than $300 million in multi-year orders for Digit v5 from a single customer it doesn't identify. Set that beside $1.8 million in actual sales and the shape of the business is clear: almost all of the commercial case for a $2.5 billion company sits inside one purchase order.
The deployments named in the filing are real, and the customers are not small. GXO, Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada, Schaeffler, Mercado Libre. At GXO, Digit cleared more than 100,000 totes under a robots-as-a-service contract, which is about as close to a paying commercial customer as this category has produced. None of that is the $300 million.
When one buyer carries the forecast, that buyer holds your pricing, your roadmap and your delivery dates, and you have nothing to negotiate back with. Losing them doesn't take a percentage off the plan, it takes the plan. That's expensive money you never raised and can't refinance, and it doesn't feel like a risk while you're taking it, because a large order looks like the best news the company has had.
The forecast is a factory plan
Agility projects 800 deployments in 2027, 7,000 in 2030 and 25,000 in 2035. That curve is a bill of materials, a supplier qualification schedule, a field service organization, a spare parts depot and a training program, each of which has to exist before the units it supports can ship.
Eight hundred in 2027 is the number worth arguing about, because it arrives soonest and it's the only one anybody can hold the company to on this side of the merger. Everything past it is a slope drawn between a near-term commitment and a market size. The far end of the curve costs nothing to write down. The near end has to be built with money the company doesn't yet have from customers it has mostly not yet billed.
The question I keep putting to my own numbers is which of them would survive being written into a document with a penalty attached. Deployed, piloted, engaged, in evaluation: those all survive a board meeting. Shipped, invoiced and collected survive a filing. Companies that never run the comparison tend to find out about a year late that what they were calling traction was a line item in somebody else's research budget. That comparison is why I ask a founder for an invoice before I spend time on a logo slide.
I'm not calling Agility's business thin. Sixty-five thousand hours in live warehouses is more commercial evidence than most of this category has, and the company put its numbers where anyone can check them. What I'd want to know before believing the curve is which of those nine sites would sign again at a price that covers the robot, because humanoids give a good demo, and a demo is the easiest thing in this business to mistake for demand.
From Dave’s video library
Dave covers how founders end up with months of engineering behind them and no evidence anyone will pay for it, which is the gap these numbers put a price on.
I’m here to help you scale.
Work With DavePrefer a smaller first step? Book a $500 one-hour working session →
Dave Saunders is the founder of Base Reality Group and a Fractional CPO for product companies. He was a founder and operator at Galen Robotics, where the surgical-robotics platform earned FDA De Novo authorization in 2023, and he managed a 35-patent portfolio licensed from Johns Hopkins. He wrote Founders Who Finish and publishes The Build. More about Dave →